Jump to content

Talk:Oz Almog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:OZ - 3.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:OZ - 3.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 17 February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:OZ - 3.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portrayal

[edit]

There has been recent activity trying to remove a documentary about this artist. It is properly sourced and relevant. Let's open up a space for discussion about it here in case there are any valid concerns. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 19:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not seem to support the text you added. MarioGom (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:MarioGom, just wondering if sentence, from the source you are removing, was overlooked: "Penniless and in a new country where no one knew his name or decorated past, Dvorkin got a job with renowned Israeli painter Oz Almog. Over two decades, he put Almog's ideas on canvas and did it quickly. For one of Almog's most famous projects, Him Too…??, a series of portraits of well-known Jews, he paid Dvorkin $50 US per portrait. He produced more than 2,000 of them." ? Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 04:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if this source meets your approval, saying the same thing: 1, and oh yeah, the documentary itself says the same thing (and is third party source). Are you saying that the documentary about a famous person can't be included for some reason? Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do any of the two linked sources support the claim that The documentary film Portrayal [...] contained admissions from Almog that much of his work has been the result of assistants or art fabricators? MarioGom (talk) 13:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Vladimir Dvorkin" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vladimir Dvorkin and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#Vladimir Dvorkin until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]