Talk:Oxhydroelectric effect
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
sigh... this is mostly Woo -- do a little study on your onw -
[edit]- and, No, anything by Pollack et al. is NOT "study, it is a trip into the fantasy land of half-truths and misunderstanding
What is my Source? My background in Navy Nuclear Power, which, as you should have already guessed, involves a deep study of... WATER 147.253.241.225 (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate your concern, and your deep studies on water. However, there is a better criterion to tell if something is Science or not, which is Scientific Literature.
- I have added references to three independent publications which cite the seminal research. Those three articles are published on peer reviewed journals which have impact factors in the Q1 and Q2 quartiles of their respective fields, as per the SCIMAGO (Elsevier) indexing service.
- Therefore, I have removed the template mentioning pseudoscience.
- About the self-promotion, I am not sure of the reason for that concern, maybe the proponent may articulate this concern. Oakwood (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)