Talk:Oxford Entrepreneurs
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oxford Entrepreneurs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Oxford Entrepreneurs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141021182807/http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/mar/05/student-entrepreneurs-uk-lack-business-angel to http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/mar/05/student-entrepreneurs-uk-lack-business-angel
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Mention of scandal lacks a source
[edit]Please see this recent revert which took out mentions of some scandals from the article: "..had several scandals which the University had to investigate particularly with regards to misconduct on the part of its advisory board members and their Presidents." I don't see any mention of these scandals in any of the references, so the accusatory material (which has now been removed) should be left out of the article per WP:BLP. If you think you have found anything to substantiate the scandals, please offer your evidence for review on this talk page. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)