Talk:Oxford City Stars

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Oxfordshire may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Carpo1982 (talk) 08:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Hi all. I'm in the process of doing a major gut of this page and getting it up to standard. As a result, i'm going to remove the historic tag that was place on the page back in 07 about primary sources, i'm aware of this and will sort it out over the next week or so. If anyone has an issue please restore the tag and comment here. Cheers, Carpo.[reply]

Expert review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was: The team is notable. I will change the tags accordingly. --B. Wolterding 09:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This review has been announced on the talk page of WikiProject Ice Hockey. Comments should be added on this page, below.

As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. The team in question is an amateur team, playing in the third-highest league in England (for all I understand), so it's not clear that it is directly notable. It's more a question of how far one should go in covering individual teams. What is your general standard for that on WikiProject Ice Hockey?

Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 13:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that WP:HOCKEY has even set a threshold for notability for European teams. Based on the template at the bottom of the article, it would seem that this team plays at the third level of British hockey? There are articles for all minor league teams in North America, even those that below the third tier, but hockey in North America is much bigger than it is in the UK. There are also articles on teams and leagues the 2nd and 3rd tiers of junior ice hockey, but again, same reason. Even though it is stated in the league article that this team plays in an amateur league, I would personally argue that since it is in a unified national league, has a history over 20 years (founded in 1984), and in the third tier of British hockey, that the team, and others in this league, are notable. Reso lute 19:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that it was. The Elite League itself would rate (at level best) as a low minor league in comparison to the North American leagues, which would probably place this loop around Tier II juniors in quality. The most recent consensus is that Tier II teams are notable. Ravenswing 23:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]