Talk:Oxbridge Applications

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

I have written this article not as an advertising tool as suggested: I have nothing to do with the company at all. I have written it because I am writing a project on small businesses and entrepreneurs and came accross James Uffindell as Young Entreprenuer of the year- I felt it would be helpful for other students such as myself to be able to view small business strategies such as the ones used by Oxbridge Applications which is a firm of significant interest to business students studying start ups and small company developments. Given that there has also been multiple discussions about this firm in the media I feel a page is justified. Hquinncey (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversy" section

An User:81.103.20.133 has reverted my deletion of the "Controversy" section. To avoid tit-for-tat reversion I've flagged the section as unreferenced. Unless reliable sources can be found to back up the assertions in the section then it must and will be deleted again according to Wikipedia policies such as WP:V and WP:RS. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable valididty of this page under G11 and use of wikipedia for advertising an individual company. This does not qualify for encyclopedic entry. Frexcel (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]