Talk:Owl City/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Will finish in short time. — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry but this has to be a quick fail. Here is an overview of the problems;
- Lead - it is in a bad condition and needs expansion to summarize the article.
- Refs - they are BARE (not completely filled) as well as few of them are unreliable and few are dead
- Due to lack of ref-standard, I doubt the content as misleading info can also be present. This is just a thought and not a reason to quick fail
- Few claims still require reliable sources as they are completely unsourced.
- Copyediting - The article is not upto the standards of GA and need copyediting from someone experienced
This was a premature nom and the article isn't near to a GA. I'll start my work on the article now. — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 06:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)