Talk:Overloaded: The Singles Collection/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 13:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article tomorrow. (Monday 30th) Aaron • ^{You Da One} 11:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

You still list the normal chronology of the last and next album, regardless of what type of album it is.
- Done. Till 11:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I c/e this section slightly.
Can you add a release history table?
- Okay. Should I also list the credits? Till 11:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - What do you mean? Just the Country, date, format and label. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 11:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - No no, like a separate credits/personnel section. Like this. Till 11:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Yes. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 11:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Mirror has been linked twice, only link the first.
- Unlinked. Till 11:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]