Jump to content

Talk:Overdrawn at the Memory Bank/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SL93 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I appreciate that you fixed the issues that were raised in the earlier peer review. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I ran Earwig and everything checks out. I see that the issues were taken care of and I added the newspaper.com clippings.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: SL93 (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]