Talk:Outrageous (song)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 06:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article appears to be stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Album image needs to be 300px or less to comply with fair use requirements.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- "Outrageous" would be released as the fourth single from the album and would be serviced to radio stations..." - Is "serviced" the correct term?
- Changed it for "sent". Xwomanizerx (talk) 13:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Summary: Overall, there are just a few minor issues that need to be fixed, before this can be passed. I will allow up to seven days for these to be resolved, before making any decision.
Final summary: Thanks for all your hard work in making this a better article. I am now satisfied that it meets all the criteria to be a Good Article and am happy to pass it. -- S Masters (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)