Talk:Outline of sculpture
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to
[edit]See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Guidelines for outlines
[edit]Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
The "History of" section needs links!
[edit]Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates. Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Straw poll and discussion concerning what outlines should be called
[edit]A discussion is underway that may affect the name of this article.
See: Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Should articles named "Outline of x" be renamed to "List of x topics"?
The Transhumanist 04:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
[edit]"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
How do we want to
[edit]define Contemporary here? The obvious way is that the sculptor as of 2016 is still alive. I figure that a quarter to a third, maybe more, (I have not done the math yet) of these folks are not alive. So should we move them back a list to Modern sculptors, just drop them from the list or what. If I don't hear from you pretty soon I am going to assume that this means I can do whatever I want and I shall proceed in that direction, whatever that might be. Maybe add dates to the dead ones, maybe something else depending on whether I've taken my meds, whether Mercury is still retrograde, that sort of thing. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)