Talk:Outflow boundary/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Add publisher information into the references. Not that I can review this article for GA passage since I'm responsible for 2/3 of its content (I'm a secondary reviewer), but still, it's a task that needs to be done. Also, the effects section is a stub. The section either needs to be expanded, or that line needs to go elsewhere within the article below the lead. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These issues are now fixed, and the article is nearly 60% larger, which will improve the chances of GA passage. I'm guessing I'll be the one responding to reviewer's comments, since there was no motion on the items mentioned above. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks great overall, and I could find very few issues. My only suggestion would be to specify whether outflow boundaries are the same as gust fronts in the lead. Once this is completed, I'll be happy to pass the article. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. It is done. Thanks for reviewing the article. I was really looking for a way to revert the template to its usual look, but a review solves the problem too. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]