This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
@Kvng Thank you so much for your feedback! We’ve taken your suggestion and identified what we believe are the three best sources that establish OMERACT's notability:
Tugwell, Peter et al. (2007), "OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology," Trials. This article highlights OMERACT's global impact on rheumatology clinical trials and its collaborations with key health organizations like WHO and EULAR. It also outlines the core sets of measures that have become central to rheumatology research.
"Rheumatology's Divergent Thinkers" (The Rheumatologist, 2024). This piece emphasizes OMERACT’s innovative role in rheumatology, showcasing its influence and the important contributions of its key members in shaping outcome measures in the field.
Thanks, these sources appear to be reliable, independent and demonstrate interest in the topic over a significant time period. Thanks for doing the homework. ~Kvng (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]