Talk:Oundle

Oundle received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Northamptonshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northamptonshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northamptonshire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorthamptonshireWikipedia:WikiProject NorthamptonshireTemplate:WikiProject NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

why have links and references to Oundle School been removed? 81.100.105.39 22:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oundle 'hospitium'

Why is there no reference for the 'document' allegedly citing Oundle as the location of a 'hospitium' in 638 AD? This sort of omission is very frustrating, for many reasons: please would somebody rectify it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nortonius (talk • contribs) 10:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Ok - it's been two months since I put a Fact tag on that statement about a 'document' mentioning a 'hospitium' in Oundle in 638, and nothing's been done about it - I'm taking it out right now. But be sure, I'd be delighted if it could be given a ref, & so be put back in! Nortonius (talk) 08:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have found your hospitium here. I have replaced the mention of a 'hospitium' in a slightly modified form, as htere was no mention of the document.--ServeDotty (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Oundle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120228055026/http://www.oundle-online.co.uk:80/louise-mensch-mp-member-of-parliament-for-oundle-corby-and-east-northamptonshire/ to http://www.oundle-online.co.uk/louise-mensch-mp-member-of-parliament-for-oundle-corby-and-east-northamptonshire/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oundle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140103065303/http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=stowe_ms_944_f029v to http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=stowe_ms_944_f029v

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oundle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130505040506/http://oundlechronicle.co.uk/2009/06/matching-twins to http://oundlechronicle.co.uk/2009/06/matching-twins

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted section on Oundle Grammar School.

I reverted the edit which removed the bit about 1465, because I actually had references on that fact which I had intended to add to the article when I had the time to sort them out. I have since added a reference.--ServeDotty (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Oundle

There are two sources I am beginning to work with that deal with the archaeology of the area, here and here. If anybody wants to work on them, please feel free.--ServeDotty (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]