Jump to content

Talk:Otter Pops

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Renaming of the Rip Van flavor

[edit]

How can they have been introduced in 1970 and Rip Van whatsit's name not been changed UNTIL the 70's? ~~sophi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiii (talkcontribs) 05:29, 9 april 2006 (UTC)

The product was introduced in 1970, the name was never changed until the mid 70's. The product would have been around for 5+ years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.80.10.198 (talk) 22:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Freezing

[edit]

Hi! The image might look a little more appetising if they were frozen, without splashes of spilled bits lying around on the work surface. Kate (talk) 00:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I must say though, I laughed. The red ones ALWAYS leak. not sure why it's always the red, I think they're typically the first or last one in the packaging (with the extra thick border on the seam). Same for fla-vor-ice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.149.81 (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

I find this article has notability. It provides a quick overview of the history which brought me up to speed quickly. For this I thank the Wikipedia community.

75.79.60.41 (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Notability

[edit]

I have no idea why one brand name or phrase becomes a pop culture meme and another does not but for some reason otter pops are notable. While the marketing was obviously aimed at much smaller kids I was part of a group of teenagers who associated otter pops with our partying; They were as important to the drug culture of a 1970's midwestern suburb as rolling papers. KDB955 (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KDB955 (talkcontribs) 17:20, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number of flavors?

[edit]

The article states there are 6 flavors, but immediately after there are 7 flavors listed. Which is correct? 172.58.35.134 (talk) 13:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Otter Pops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]