Talk:Ottawa Citizen

Canada: Ottawa Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottawa (assessed as Mid-importance).

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mideast conflict

It would be a good idea if we could gather information on the Toronto Star's editorial policies on the Mideast conflict, which is a controversial topic in contemporary journalism. ADM (talk) 09:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous readers' comments on articles

The citizen has finally figured out that allowing readers to publicly comment on stories without requiring a long registration process provides the paper with a lot more feedback. They are now following in the footsteps of the Ottawa Business Journal which pioneered this philosophy many years ago. They are still ahead of the G&M and the Sun papers in this respect...

I do believe this desreves mention in the Wikipedia article, however since this is original research on my part (until someone writes about it), it cannot be included, sigh... Ottawahitech (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Political position

The infobox states that the paper is "Centre-left". I see a contradiction with the article which states that the Citizen endorsed the Conservatives in 2006. I placed a citation-needed tag so if anyone can find references to back the "center-left" claim or to fix it would be great. - CET^TALK 01:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ottawa Citizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120601051953/http://www.ottawacitizen.com:80/news/Citizen+Sunday+paper+newsroom+jobs/6691665/story.html to http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Citizen+Sunday+paper+newsroom+jobs/6691665/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]