Talk:Otra Nota/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 03:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Erick! I've picked ut this for review. Regards. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 03:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overview

External links checked, only some changes the sub-domain and all the Allmusic sites changes their url, but nothing to worry about.
No disambiguation links on the album.
The nominator has been alerted of the GA review.
The article has the correct (?), better to say is well structured into sections and sub-sections.
It's well referenced
Information is given with a good prose.
It covers the topic very abroad and on a detailed form, without unnecesarry information.
No certifications? (comment)
Isn't it better of we rename the section Music to Music and lyrics?

Ok, nothing else to overview. I'l be reading the whole article today and write my prose comments. Cheers! --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 17:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I changed the section as suggestion. As for certifications, not as far as certifying authorities go. I think it did receive a certification in Puerto Rico, but that was before the RIAA started the Latin certifications in 2000 so it's not a certifying authority. [1] Erick (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've cheked everything. Good work. i think it's ready.

Verdict

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Final comment: Good work. An album article about a latin artist (no rare) long time waiting for review, and that seemed to need nothing but some little tweaks. Well done. --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 19:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was easy. LOL :P Erick (talk) 19:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is up to standard :) --Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 19:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.