Talk:Otjiherero grammar
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Otjiherero grammar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yesterday's / Completed Past
[edit]It says 'See the section on behalvatory suffixes' - but I can't see such a section. Kanjuzi (talk) 21:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Tone?
[edit]Does Otjiherero have tones? Perhaps you could add something to say whether it has or not, even if no details are given. Kanjuzi (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Table Formatting
[edit]During CE of the article the way the tables are formatted bothers me. The main heading of the table is just included as plain text. I'm not skilled in changing this so maybe someone else can. HRouillier (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Translate
[edit]Uriri 105.232.255.11 (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Do you want to be fort
[edit]Do you want to be forced 41.182.50.201 (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)