Talk:Oscar Schlitter

It is requested that an image or photograph of Oscar Schlitter be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Oscar Schlitter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Oscar Schlitter sold his house in Berlin's "Mayfair" to Joseph Goebbels for "a very modest sum"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oscar Schlitter.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Red Links

According to Wikipedia:REDDEAL, since it's unlikely these redlinks will have English counterparts, they should be replaced with superscripts. Agreed? --FeldBum (talk) 01:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how I read the policy / guideline to which you gave us a link. However, wiki policies / guidelines are not my specialist subject. When I have taken time to try and figure them out I have frequently been mightily impressed by the level of internal contradictions in many of them.

As far as your suggestion is concerned, therefore, it's largely a question of intuition and common sense. Yours.

As far as superscripts are concerned, when I use them I find they tend to get corrected (aka reversed) by well intentioned people who (presumably) think superscripts look funny (which on little screens and portable telephones they probably do) and have (presumably) found a wiki policy / guideline to support them in the opinion they thought of in the first place

As far as my own reaction is concerned (1) this entry has a lot of red links. Uncomfortably many if you don't like the colo(u)r red. But (2) several of them are likely to turn blue in the foreseeable future as people are moved to translate them. That's the point of the little language icon linking to a perfectly adequate (in .... many cases) wiki entry which is in the "wrong" language. Problem is, I don't have any way of knowing which of the red links is likely to turn blue in the foreseeable future when people have moved to start a translation into English. Different people have different areas of interest. And, in fairness, some of the non-English wiki language entries linked here are ... better than others!

Success Charles01 (talk) 06:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]