Talk:Osama bin Laden's bodyguards
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
- This article was nominated for deletion here on 2012-04-30 and kept on 2012-05-14.
new name?
[edit]I wish the wikipedian who renamed this article from Osama bin Laden bodyguard to Alleged bodyguards of Osama bin Laden had discussed this first.
I think adding "Alleged" is a mistake. The context of the references make clear that these are allegations. Or they are in direct quotes from memos of allegations. People aren't accused of being an "alleged Osama bin Laden bodyguard". They are just accused of being OBL bodyguards. The alleged is implied in the accusation.
I am going to list this on wikipedia:requested moves.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 02:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
responsible use of tags
[edit]This article was recently {{prod}}ed.
Nominator asserted "Sourced to primary sources only, and primarily from one source, to boot. No real possibility of expansion in that case, and certainly not encyclopedic, as we don't have an overview, merely the testimony of one man."
Google news finds almost 800 news references to this term, so I am removing the prod. Geo Swan (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Then I'll take this to AfD. MSJapan (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
explanation
[edit]I trimmed some material on a couple of the less significant alleged bodyguards. Geo Swan (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Removal
[edit]"Allegedly confessed that some of the individuals who were to become 9-11 hijackers had first served as Osama Bin Laden bodyguards.[1]"
as i could not find it in the attached reference. John4263 (talk) 22:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Osama bin Laden bodyguards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/nyregion/24terror.html?pagewanted=print
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080716130843/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_000944-001045.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_000944-001045.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507053323/http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_001161-001234.pdf to http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/ARB_Round_1_Factors_001161-001234.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.why-war.com/news/2004/08/03/binladin.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20113195-503543.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)