Talk:Os Grandes Portugueses

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Portugal Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Article name

Hi, João! Seems you had the same idea as me... but beat me to it ;) But I'm taking the chance while it's a fresh article to know if you think the article should be renamed to "Os Grandes Portugueses" as it is written on it's website . Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 00:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it is in the page, it must be written "Os Grandes Portugueses" Nuno Raimundo 22:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Salazar controversy - let's stick to the facts

Salazar's nomination as the greatest portuguese is an admitedly controversial topic. I suggest we abstain of stating opinions on that. Let's stick to the facts and keep interpretations to ourselves. With time, as interpretations from reliable sources show up, we can address those. With that in mind, I just cleaned up the text in that regard. --koenige 01:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the right and the left cannot never agree on this one.

I have changed it again, to now a more moderate version. Not just a left wing tending one posing as moderate.

A lot of the stuff that had been left in is not ackowledged as a fact for the whole population. We can keep changing each others stuff until doomsday, but no one will come out winning.

Salazar was a hero or a villain. The opinions have long been formed. But we can keep it moderate.

I think this version is a moderate one. I have left opinions I DO NOT AGREE WITH. Lets try and keep the drama and inflated language out of it.

And yes, I do read history books and also know the country well, including the benefits and faults of Estado Novo.

Perhaps this page should be locked for a week or so... I've asked it at the portuguese version because there was fight with the word "fascista" (a user removed it, another added it, and so on), and I think it was the best decision to avoid the vandalism... For the number of editions of today maybe that's the most wise and troublless decision (at least until this settles down)... IMHO... Crazy Murdoc 23:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]