Talk:Orono, Minnesota

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Cities

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Addition to Summary

I added a detail, with references, that justified and expanded on the use of the word "affluent" in the first sentence of the article. No one objected to the word "affluent" in that instance. My intent was to add a reference to what was already mentioned (without references). MANY articles on towns and cities include references to rankings of wealth or other statistics in the summary of the article. See: Greenwich, Connecticut - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwich,_Connecticut or La Jolla, CA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Jolla - just the first two I picked at random. I am not adding anything remotely unusual here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User232323 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC) .[reply]

Thanks for pointing those out. I will remove them too. WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a valid argument. Please see this for the reliability of one of your sources. Your other ref, altho reliable, only discusses the realeastate prices in the community. Houses cost a butt load there, eh? It is YOUR conclusion that the city is wealthy, a term again, per our discussion at your userpage, is subjective. What is the exact definition of wealthy? Are you wealthy if you live in a $600,000 house? How about a $550,000 house? I removed the affluent too. Please be aware that if you replace the content again, you will be in violation of WP:3RR and subject to an immediate block. You are welcome to ask for a third opinion, but if you re-add the info again without a consensus, which you do not have, you will quite likely be blocked. John from Idegon (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are objective measures of affluence or wealth. It is an objective fact that property values in this city are among the highest in the nation. It is an objective fact that household income in this city is among the highest in the nation. You are claiming POV simply because you don't want that content included. "Orono has among the highest property values and household incomes in the United States." -- Please let me know on what basis you object to adding that sentence. If you are really hung-up on the terms "wealth" or "affluence," you should have no objection to that. This is relevant, referenced information. User232323 (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Orono, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Orono, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]