Talk:Orodromeus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which Makela?

"The specific name honoured the late Makela." - I took a look at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makela

Now, I assume the author referred to Toivo Mäkelä, since he died in 1979, and the dinosaur was named in 1988. However, it could be any one of them who are currently dead. Can anybody help me? --77.77.252.85 (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, sorry, my bad. It was mentioned before in the text. --77.77.252.85 (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eggs?

Various sources state the eggs formerly referred to Orodromeus are now thought to belong to a troodont. Yet this article still mentions eggs as paratypes, so are eggs also known for this genus, or is it a mistake? If a mistake, it should certainly be mentioned these were once though tot be long to this animal, anyhow. FunkMonk (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a mistake. The eggs, MOR 246 (there is no 249!) are also in the Stenonychosaurus article. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 15:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, seems we need an update then... FunkMonk (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 17:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]