Talk:Ornate burrowing frog

Australia: New South Wales / Northern Territory / Queensland / Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Ornate burrowing frog is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Ornate burrowing frog is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger with Limnodynastes ornatus

As far as I can tell, the Limnodynastes ornatus article and the Ornate burrowing frog article pertain to the same species; the common names given on both articles are the same, the scientific name Limnodynastes ornatus is given on both, and the descriptions on each article appear consistent with each other. Unless someone is able to demonstrate that these articles are actually about two different species, these two articles should be merged. Neelix (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - If you see : here you will note under taxconomy in the synonymy the scientific names of both pages appear. Hence yes definitely the same species. Cheers, Faendalimas ^talk 00:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and completed the merge as a straight redirect. The former Limnodynastes ornatus stub did not have much reliably sourced new material, and so I don't believe anything from it needs incorporating.--Animalparty-- (talk) 03:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]