Talk:Oriental magpie

Birds Low‑importance

Oriental magpie is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

I was told by a few Korean friends that hearing a magpie in the morning means someone you lost from your life will be returning that day. After 3 years in Korea I have heard this bird almost every morning but it has not brought anyone back into my life.

Magpie instead of chicken

I'm rather dubious about the claim that chicken-on-a-stick are actually magpies, since chicken is not so rare and it's probably more work than it's worth to secretly use magpie meat instead. Perhaps in the past, but the rumors I've heard was they were pigeon meat, and I'm skeptical of them, too. Are there any reliable sources which can back up this claim being true in the past or the present? YooChung 14:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also dubious, because I tried to cook and eat an American magpie when I was a child ... the meat is dark, strong-tasting and extremely tough. There is also very little edible meat on the bird. After you get the feathers off, it's a very scrawny bird. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.42.126.18 (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence of the claim that the chicken-on-a-sticks in street are magpies in Korea. There are also many rumors that the sources of the meat are the domestic doves, the tree sprarrows and/or some buntings. However, in most cases, the meats used in chicken-on-a-sticks are not products of Korea, but are imported from China as ready-made goods; the meat is definitely a chicken, of course, due to a unit cost. Although the magpie and the other birds above are common both in Korea and China, a unit cost of production will be much more increased otherwise manufacturers use cheap and easily-available chickens in large quantities. Recently, because of safty and quaratine issues, the Korean custom temporary stopped inspecting chicken-on-a-sticks imported from China and most provisionors in Korea suffer from a shortage in stock. subbuteo95 (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't Korea and China the same place? It would seem so due to the fact that the majority of the Korean magpie's range lies in China. If so, then this argument is moot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.203.236.170 (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Flow

Article says: "the best explanation is that some limited gene flow still occurred until the onset of the last period of ice ages some 2.5-2 mya."

How exactly can "gene flow" keep two mtDNA groups linked?

It could produce a mixed population, with some individuals having the isolated (Korean) mtDNA and others a migrant mtDNA, but as mtDNA is (supposed to be) only maternally-inherited, the two mtDNA types could not "influence" each other after the initial maternal ancestor split.

Perhaps this is referring to nuclear DNA -- but the article previously only mentions an mtDNA testing of Magpies.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fan-tailed Raven which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Korean? magpie

According to the distribution map in the article, P. p. serica is not present on the Korean peninsula. Of course, the vernacular name could be misleading, but Korean cities can hardly pick a subspecies of magpie which are not present in the region, as their symbol. Creuzbourg (talk) 14:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Name

Is the oriental magpie called pica serica or pica sericea? I am no ornithologist so I don't feel qualified to edit this, but I am seeing both names on different sites apparently referring to the same species. Teatime77 (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]