Talk:Organology

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organologists

shouldn't there be a "List of Organologists" page? NDCompuGeek 00:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Victor-Charles Mahillon

Can u sayd some word about : Victor-Charles Mahillon ? I think that it's a VIP in the history of Organology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.219.143.87 (talk) 16:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikitanvirBot problem

Hi, is there a way to stop the bot making cs:Organologie (varhany)? The right link is cs:Organologie. Thanks. --ॐ (Aum) (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

The entire concept is pure nonsense and should not be worth a Wikipedia article, unless it's absurdity is specifically mentioned. Every instrument, just like everything else on earth, produces sound by vibrating air. Every instrument works through vibrating a material that creates air vibrations. Synthesizers do not produce sound, nor do brainwaves or other "electrophones". The attached speakers do. By vibrating solid material, just like any string or wind instrument. --2003:4C:6D45:BBB2:DD16:84DF:5F75:82A7 (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The section on elementary organology has been moved to Musical instrument classification. Hyacinth (talk) 09:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

It's rather odd that the list of "Prominent organologists" contains 11 entries, only 3 of which mention the word "organology"; who says these are prominent organologist? Ivor Darreg? Really? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very out-of-place/overly specific sections?

The sections "Outside perspectives on the Hornbostel–Sachs classification system" and "Alternative perspectives on the classification of musical instruments" are each just a paragraph long and seem out of place compared to the rest of the article - while connected to the subject, the rest of the article is an overview of organology while these are summaries of very specific perspectives held by a couple individuals on specific concepts in the field. I think they should be moved to other articles on the subjects the sections are commenting on or moved to a new singular section with subheadings for each one, and some other text tying them into the main article. Without doing that, it feels very much like the article is "here's an overview of what organology is and also this perspective two people share on the Hornbostel–Sachs classification system and then more general info about organology". Merlin04^talk_contribs 18:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]