Talk:Organizational patterns
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
I would like to insert a section called "Existing Pattern Catalogs". However, before I do that, I'd like to seek out opinions first.
--Kenlohwh (talk) 08:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
It could be cool — if they're really patterns. What did you have in mind? Alistair's stuff, the Org Pats book, the Beedle et al. work, Ward's EPISODES, and a few others all count. Maybe even Steve Berczuk's patterns would qualify. And now there are the new Scrum patterns. There are other publications that are patterns in name only, or only in that they use pattern form. If we stick to the stuff that's rooted in empirical grounding and sound pattern foundations I'm all for it. And, you're right, there's probably quite a smattering.