Talk:Organic field-effect transistor

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Device Design - TFT section - Why should Fermi level misalignment lead to band bending at a MIS interface?

It is written: "If there is zero bias, the electrons are expelled from the surface due to the Fermi-level energy difference of the semiconductor and the metal.". I do not understand why this should happen, because there is no charge that could expell another charge. In my opinion, this explanation is only available to metal (organic) semiconductor interfaces, because there the different Fermi levels can align by flowing charges and with this a band bending occurs. But for the MIS interface this cannot happen, since the charges cannot flow through the insulator. Mentioning a source for the given statement would be helpful or providing a more detailed explanation. BrightEyes5554 (talk) 14:52, 07 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.206.127.102 (talk) [reply]

Feynmans Law

Oh dear. This article is useless to anyone who doesnt study or work in the field of electronics, isnt it.

Needs a serious cleanup. Wikipedia isnt for semiconductor experts, its for people, and as Richard Feynman says, if you cant explain a concept to highschool kids, it means you dont understand it yourself. Not clever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.110.239.227 (talk) 11:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The article was clearly written by some excited graduate student, probably one doing synthesis (eg an organic chemist who sometimes uses materials characterization instruments, spending 85-95% of their time in front of a fume hood and more practical, hands on, specialization in air/oxygen free organic synthesis than tricky solid state sample prep or device construction and a much more limited mathematical background than your typical solid state materials science person)2600:1700:DEA0:EE80:78FA:1EF2:798C:46D7 (talk) 00:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]