Talk:Oregon tax revolt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

This article was a Collaboration of the Week/Month for WikiProject Oregon October 27–November 16, 2009.

Rural school budgets versus Portland school budgets

The assertion that rural schools benefited from Measure 5 while the Portland school district budget went down is marked "dubious - discuss." Willamette Week reported: "The fact is that since the passage of Measure 5 in 1990, the Portland school district has suffered while more rural districts like Snodgrass' have benefited. Gresham-Barlow, for example, has seen its budget jump from $43.3 million in 1991-92 to $57.9 million in 1998-99--a 33.7 percent increase. More important, per-student moneys in the district have gone up 20.6 percent, from $3,859 to $4,656. During the same period, Portland's public-school budget has gone down from $285 million to $279 million, and per-student money has dropped 2.4 percent, from $4,736 to $4,619." http://wweek.com/html/leada112498.html Is that adequate reference? Gelasticjew (talk) 05:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Willamette Week isn't exactly known for having much objective balance when it comes to schools and taxes. It is easily argued that aggregate funding changes reflect aggregate changes of student population. However, the statement is one side of the argument. I guess we need to find the other side too. With both statements and supporting citations, I'm happy including both. —EncMstr (talk) 07:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the separate entry for Measure 5, which cites an Oregonian article on the school finance shift. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlabbott (talk • contribs) 16:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Oregon tax revolt/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class==

Stub class because one section and not enough references.EECavazos 00:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==WP Tax Priority==

Mid priority because although it was a localized issue in the state, the article draws on a movement in other states in the USA.EECavazos 00:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)