This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This is a good start to the article! The Controversy section could use some rewording and some additional information. It doesn't discuss how George was chosen, or summarize the argument against including George as an OBOB book. It also doesn't mention the other responses at other school districts (e.g. the Canby school district decided to participate in OBOB, but without George on the reading list). -- Sandbergja (talk) 03:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The lead section was very eye catching and made the topic easy to understand. The article was very interesting and detailed. The structure of it all was very organized and the headings make everything clear and separated. I liked that you covered the definition, history and more about OBOB. It's such a fun and important program and I remember participating in it years ago.
NoahJacobsen (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]