Talk:Order of Heptasophs/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'll review this. Will jot some queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Can't end a sentence with ", etc."
- Allegedly the ancient King of Persia would select six Magi ... - I'd make it more definitive that it was a story they told, so something like "They reported/recalled/claimed the ancient King of Persia would select six Magi....."
- Why is "introduced" in quote marks?
- What happens after 1877? Does the organisation die out/grow/what?
- Sourcing seems a bit meagre. A cyclopedia is a tertiary source. Surely something more has been written?
- Book sources need ISBNs
That's enough to get started. More later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality: - first pass found issues still unfixed.
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects: - sparse sourcing noted above. Appear to be large gaps in coverage.
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias: - seems to be neutral
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - sorry, issues of comprehensiveness and referencing unaddressed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)