Talk:Ord River

Australia: Western Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Ord River is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Logistics of the ORIS

"Contrary to some claims made by rail operators, the ORIS does not use the Katherine Intermodal Terminal to move its produce to market." Could someone add a citation to the above statement if one exists? Thanks, Swampy 124.179.92.243 (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To include

The various setbacks, stages and project funding need to be detailed. This 2009 article in the Australian might be useful. - Shiftchange (talk) 15:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ord River Irrigation Area ORIA v ORIS

Should the information on the Ord River Irrigation Area (ORIA - aka Ord Scheme) be broken out into a new page? Should the "Ord River Irrigation Scheme" (ORIS is not in as common use as ORIA) Section really be broken out into a "History" section? KHS-Boab (talk) 16:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, but I can't see why for the time being it can't be expanded on this page. - Shiftchange (talk) 03:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for the rapid reply, I have carried on here and added various sections to the history. Hope this is ok as I am fairly new and novice to wiki. KHS-Boab (talk) 09:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I will keep an eye on it and correct any mistakes. - 09:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Negri River

I notice that the Negri River link leads to a river in Romania. That page needs a disambiguation notice. Is the following sufficient to place on the Negri River (Romania) page?

This article is about Negri River, (Romania). For Negri River, Australia, see Negri River, Australia.

Having said that I am suggesting that the new page that needs to be created however should be "Negri River, Australia" as the river rises in the Northern Territory and flows into the Ord River as a tributary inside Western Australia. Does this make sense and is the line above enough to place on the Negri River (Romania) page? (Select Edit to see the code) - Any takers to help out a newbie? KHS-Boab (talk) 14:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that hatnote is the correct one, however the name of the Australian river should be Negri River (Australia) to conform to naming conventions and because it flows through more than one state. - Shiftchange (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better would be turning Negri River into a disambiguation page, and changing the current one to Negri River (Romania). - DavidWBrooks (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shiftchange - As you or David were writing so was I and I got an edit conflict as I had been to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Rivers and had found that as you so rightly point out that it is correct to use brackets for rivers rather than commas eg Negri River (Australia) rather than Negri River, Australia.

So had changed the note to...

This article is about Negri River (Romania). For Negri River (Australia), see Negri River (Australia).

David wouldn't that then destroy all links to the original page and the disambiguation pages says if only one other instance to leave it? IE Not to have a separate disambiguation page? - KHS-Boab (talk) 15:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't destroy the links but it would turn them into disambiguation links - which could, in future times, be updated to direct links. I have created the Australia river page, by the way, as an extreme stub.

I haven't moved a page in so long I have forgotten the process; there's a specific method so that you don't lose the Talk page. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of the Common Banana Prawn

The citation for this claim is an ABC News story, where the claim is made (unsubstantiated) by somebody opposing an irrigation scheme in Queensland. I can't even determine what a "Common Banana Prawn" is, much less its history in the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. Can anybody clarify this claim, and include a more reliable source? 60.242.66.215 (talk) 06:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ord River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110706102341/http://www.birdata.com.au/iba.vm to http://www.birdata.com.au/iba.vm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Politically correct article

It did not touch the cruel destiny of the Aboriginal tribes who lived in the Ord river basin. These people weren't even a part of any Australian census and were annihilated. Some detalis can be seen in Aboriginal Cultural Values of the Ord River and Wetlands. A Study And Report Prepared For The Water And Rivers Commission by Kim Barber and Hilary Rumley, June 2003

The Aboriginal population was decimated through killing and the spread of introduced diseases. See Land of Promises: Aborigines and Development in the East Kimberley by Herbert Cole Coombs, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, 1989 --94.68.78.151 (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

length 320 or 650 ???