Talk:Optimal foraging theory
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Priority 4
|
 | It is requested that an ecological diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Requesting graphs of the response curves described. Richard001 01:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Conclusion
[edit]I am not sure about it, but I think the article does not really need a conclusion. For me, the word "conclusion" sounds like "this is all we have about OFT, so don't worry about exploring it". Maybe it could just be replaced by "resume" or "summary". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Feliz.rhf (talk • contribs) 14:22, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- In such cases you're encouraged to be bold and make the change yourself, if you feel it will improve the article. I've replaced the "Conclusion" title to something more specific that describes the section's content. Diego (talk) 09:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)