Talk:Oppenheimer security clearance hearing/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 02:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Review

Just a few typos so far. Djmaschek (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• Robert Oppenheimer, paragraph 3: "it was Lawrence that..." (who)

  Y Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• Chevalier incident, paragraph 4: "foundJohn" (space)

  Y Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Here are more. Djmaschek (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• Postwar conflicts, paragraph 4: "developing the Super". I was born in the USA in 1953 but had no idea what "Super" meant. It later dawned on me that this must be "H-bomb" in American English. Please decipher this for American readers. Suggest: "Super (H-bomb)"

  Y It's a long story, with an article of its own. They worked on it through the Manhattan Project and into the 1950s. Oppenheimer, Bethe, Goeppert-Mayer and Fermi all had a go at it. Eventually Ulam and Teller figured it out. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• Postwar conflicts, paragraph 5: "referred top" (to)

  Y Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• Scope of testimony, last paragraph: "Robb to testified" (testify)

  Y Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

• The board's decision, paragraph 2: "conduct reflect" (reflects or reflect[s], since it's inside a quote)

  Y Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

That's all - just small stuff. Very good article. Djmaschek (talk) 03:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your review! Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.