Talk:Opinion polling for the 2015 Danish general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Need a source that Danish Peoples Party would form a coalation government with Venstre. Otherwise this looks kinda stupid. 79.136.64.95 (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evidences needed

is it possible to get such nice evidences like the UK people for their election also for the folketing election? http://www.populus.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/OmOnline_Vote_08-08-2014_BPC.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragdy (talk • contribs) 08:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alternativet

Should the table have a new column for the "Alternativet" party? Opinion polls have been including this party for a while (and that is probably why some polls do not add to 100%). "Alternativet" seems to have more chances to enter Parliament than the Christian Democrats (K) and is expected to join the Red bloc. Sources: GREENS March 31, YouGov March 10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.241.90.132 (talk) 10:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There definitely should be a column for the Alternative. They have been on 2,5% and 2,6% in two polls and 1,6 to 1,8% in several others. Tactical voting will likely carry them in as Red Bloc needs them to win, so very relevant party - unlike the Christian Dems, which have no chance and will likely just siphon off half a percentage point from Blue Bloc in the end.--Batmacumba (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have included The Alternative from March onwards and made a stu about them. Please do not revert without discussing i here. It was a lot of work to do it.--Batmacumba (talk) 04:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use correct publication dates

I have just corrected three publication dates and it has happened before that people enter polls with dates 2-3 days after the actual publication.--Batmacumba (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Red/Blue, Left/Right

Would it be better to replace the somewhat arbitrary colour-designations with left/right? MiniMax.DK (talk) 11:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's up with the colouring?

I am confused. What's the deal with the red background/highlighting of the Soc. Dem's (A) column? And what is this Lead thing? MiniMax.DK (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that the colouring is indicating the Social Democrats' status as the largest party and lead seems to refer to the difference between it and the second largest party, similar to how, generally, "blue" block is highlighted as the biggest, except in the three polls which had "red" slightly ahead. Mojowiha (talk) 12:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]