Talk:Operation Zeppelin (deception plan)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 22:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Well done

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   I made a series of spelling and grammatical changes

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Also made dates consistent, added locations to references

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Covers the subject very well

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   An image of dummy tanks or the like would be nice

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: