Talk:Operation Turkey Buzzard/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Canpark (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   References were used throughout; online references checked out, and I assume faith for the print sources.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The article is rich in content, and it focused on all the major aspects of Turkey Buzzard. Very informative.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Mainly focused on the British conduct of the operation, no clear bias.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This article meet all GA requirements, therefore I will pass it as GA Class.Canpark (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)