Talk:Operation Paula/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
Done I think. Dapi89 (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay great. Dapi89 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- It could do with a copy edit to improve the flow Done
- What makes http://france1940.free.fr/adla/ada_june.html a reliable site ?
- I don't know Jim, to be honest. I've always used this site to check French units and Orbats and I have never had cause to regret that. On the website in the citation, if you scroll down to the bottom, the editors/site admins have added a bibliography. They have cited their sources, so I trust them. Dapi89 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Just to add, I also used it 'cause I had nothing on the French side in my books. Only hints, but never a complete picture of their OB. Dapi89 (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know Jim, to be honest. I've always used this site to check French units and Orbats and I have never had cause to regret that. On the website in the citation, if you scroll down to the bottom, the editors/site admins have added a bibliography. They have cited their sources, so I trust them. Dapi89 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)