Talk:Operation Nordseetour

Operation Nordseetour has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 5, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Nordseetour/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Article title should italicise Nordseetour, suggest {{DISPLAYTITLE:Operation ''Noordseetour''}}.
- I was wondering how to do that - thanks, and done Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"with heavy cruiser seeking" cruisers? or "with the heavy cruiser"?
- 'The' - added Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"in France, Admiral" that link for France is far too much of an easter egg.
- True, tweaked Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"when she attacked on the morning of 25 December." she attacked the following morning.
"later on 25 December, and" later that day.
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"arrived in Brest two days later" -> arrived in Brest on 27 December.
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The British Royal Navy strengthened" no need for British.
- Removed Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WS5A or WS 5A?
- WS 5A, fixed
"The Kriegsmarine's (German Navy's) plans" -> "The plans of the Kriegsmarine (German Navy)"
- Tweaked along those lines Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Submarines and" U-Boats?
- Same thing really, so I've deliberately not used 'U-boat's
"The British Royal Navy anticipated" no need for British.
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"in April 1939. In February 1940" repetitive. Perhaps "The following February"?
- Oops, tweaked Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"fatally damaged" can fatally damage something that's not alive? Maybe critically damaged?
- Done Nick-D (talk)
"the Home Fleet during" what's that?
- - Tweaked Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"German air force" you had Germany Navy so I assume this should be German Air Force
- Yep, adjusted Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kriegsmarine's -> Kriegsmarine's
- Fixed, I think Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"German: "North Sea Tour" German is overlinked. Template should give you instruction on how to force it to delink.
- Fixed Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"failed to understand that" interpret perhaps?
- Tweaked Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why link Malta but not Greenland?
- Unlinked Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"The carriers" link.
- Oops, I thought I already had linked aircraft carriers - fixed, and improved the wording Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Hipper's secondary armament fired" overlinked.
- Fixed Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"them.[31][20]" ref order.
- Fixed Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"December Admiral Hipper's" comma after Dec.
- Done Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Roskill ref needs en-dash in year range.
And Steury (spaced en-dash).
And Wragg.
- All done Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 13:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks a lot for this review. Nick-D (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]