- Well-written: yes
- Factually accurate and verifiable:
A problem here with the references. Another editor has already added a [citation needed] tag to the "Enforcement of no-fly zone section"; references are also required by the "Attack on Bihać, bombing of Udbina and hostages", "Expansion of the air campaign in 1995", "Bombing of Pale and the hostage crisis", and "Response to Srebrenica".
- I've dealt with the citation needed tag. What do you think needs references in the sections needed? Feel free to use citation needed tags as appropriate.
- Done. Now you need to fix them. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed :)
Do you have page numbers for references 11,14,38,41,42,46,53,56,60?
- All of those are news articles which don't span multiple pages.
Why do some of the refs have dates and others not?
- I only see one missing the date, which I included. For the web resources without a date, it's simply because they don't give a date of publication.
- Broad in its coverage:
If Admiral Jeremy Boorda was in charge early on, shouldn't he be listed in the info box? (And why was he replaced?)
- He simply moved on to another assignment (no scandals yet in his life then). I suppose he could be listed in the infobox, but Leighton Smith commanded the majority of the operation so he seemed more appropriate.
- Oh. I thought he was promoted to CNO.
Didn't day-to-day operational command of Deny Flight reside with US Air Force lieutenant general Michael E. Ryan, commander of Allied Air Forces Southern Europe? (How about a paragraph on the command setup?)
- I suppose a paragraph could be added on command setup, I'll drag some references back up. Yes, the chain of command did run through AIRSOUTH which was Joseph Ashby, then Ryan, but in practice, given the importance of the mission Boorda and then Leighton Smith both effectively maintained day-to-day control.
- "Senior military command of Deny Flight lay with US admiral Leighton Smith, the commander of Allied Forces Southern Europe, and below him, day-to-day operational command resided with US Air Force lieutenant general Michael Ryan, commander of Allied Air Forces Southern Europe." Owen, p. 33
- I've worked in that paragraph now, tracing the chain of command down to the director of the CAOC.
- "The strike, which involved 39 aircraft, was the largest combat operation in NATO's history up to that time; nonetheless, it was criticized as a "pinprick" that did little real damage to Serb capabilities, only temporarily disabling runways."
Criticised by whom? (My guess is someone unacquainted with the difficulties of airbase busting) and how temporarily? My understanding is that no further strikes were launched from Udbina.
- Criticized by just about everyone, primarily the media. You have to keep in mind that at this point a very vocal group, particularly in the US media, were calling for heavy bombing. One of the central criticisms (and the reason that many people used the word pinprick) is that NATO deliberately avoided hitting planes on the tarmac (at the request of the UN) and only targeted the runway itself. I've added this in.
How many unauthorised flights were there?
- There were 5711 unauthorized helicopter flights (which is already in there). The figure of 3 unauthorized fixed-wing flights per month is already in there (and I guess I could multiply from that), but to the best of my knowledge NATO never actually announced a firm, final total.
I think you should mention the strand of opinion that Deny Flight proved that air power could win wars.
- To the best of my knowledge, that viewpoint is more or less exclusively associated with Operation Deliberate Force. Operation Deny Flight certainly didn't win any wars, and I've never seen a respectable scholar make that claim.
There is also the issue of the value of targeting integrated air defence systems.
- Well, I make reference to the issue of air defense in the context of the push towards stealth capabilities. What else are you looking for?
"the F/A-18D Hornet was proven to be a "highly resourceful multirole platform" for the United States Marine Corps." And that means what?
- It showed it was a useful aircraft. It seemed best to use a quote to make that point.
Did Deny Flight have any influence on the enforcement of the no-fly zone in Iraq?
- Very little. While there was influence of Iraq on Deny Flight (especially after the Black Hawk Incident), there is little indication that anything that happened in Deny Flight changed procedures or attitudes in Iraq.
- Neutral: yes
- Stable: yes.
- Illustrated, if possible, by images: yes
The images are great. The only thing I would say is that while "US Navy and US Marine Corps provided the most support for the operation" (And why was that? This is an important issue.) but most of the pictures are USAF.
- I just took the best pictures I could find, and they happened to be US Air Force (guess they better photographers?)
Does NATO have a flag?
- Yes, but it's a non-free image and thus it's only used in the article on NATO itself. Addendum: It's also used in Flag of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (for obvious reasons). Not that it's important, but I felt this should be added for the sake of accuracy).
Hawkeye7 (talk) 13:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All issues resolved. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
b (MoS): 