Talk:Operation Black Buck/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this in the next few days. Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In lead, you've got extremely and huge. I'd change huge to daunting....and take out extremely? or use a word that is not as puffed?

Second Para of Black Buck One: the seal perished? how about the seal failed?

When talking about rubber, "perish" means the deterioration caused by aging. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...bombing handed over to the control system. The attack was delivered around 0700Z. ? what handed bombing over?

I meant that control was handed over to the automated system. Changed to "automated bombing control system system was engaged" Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

defeated radars controlling the defending ... plural on radars?

Correct. Changed to "defeated the radar systems controlling the defending Skyguard anti-aircraft cannons." Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...the Argentine...wrongly assessed.... incorrectly assessed?

thanks...I think some of this is the difference in Aussie-speak and Yank-speak. ;)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
NICE!