Talk:Operation Baranja/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No DABs, external links OK
Images appropriately licensed.
Can you add a map covering the Battle of Osijeck? It's difficult to follow the preliminaries without one.
spanning between the villages of Gat and Nard I think that "extending" would be better than "spanning".
river bank opposite Gat–Nard line Need a "the" in front of Gat.
At the same time, Gorinšek was relieved of his duty. No need for "his".
In response to the HV offensive the JNA shelled HV positions Put a comma after "offensive".
while Osijek was targeted for more than ten days after the fighting in Baranja had ceased Do you mean that Osijek was fired at daily for over 10 days, or that it was targeted 10 days after the HV's attack?
number of killed troops of the 107th Brigade Awkward, probably best to reorder as "number of the 107th Brigade's troops killed in the battle".
commending combat performance of the 107th Brigade Add "the" in front of combat.
Put all of your book, article and news report titles in title case. The ones in English, anyways.
Standardize your use of place of publication for books.
Scientific journal articles, to my eyes, implies something like Physics Today, not the Review of Croatian History. Best to drop the Scientific, IMO.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to fail this for non-responsiveness. It's been two weeks and the nominator hasn't edited at all in the last month.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Contact me if you decide to renominate and I'll expedite the process since I'm already familiar with the article. Just be sure to address the issues enumerated above.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:22, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]