Talk:Open Source Industry Australia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link to FOSS

Should the link for "FOSS" be to FOSS or Free and open source software? It's set now to the latter, because that matches the expression immediately preceding it in the text. Given that FOSS and Free and open source software direct to different articles, even though FOSS is the acronym for "Free and open source software", it really looks like the two articles should be merged. However, that's a different issue. -- JDX (talk) 01:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FOSS now points to the current article. This was a mass-edit by the user who AfDed free and open source software, seemingly for the sake of orphaning it. Chris Cunningham (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]