Talk:OpenCaster

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opinionated Langauge

First, I would like to say that this is my first time adding a topic, so apologies if I make a mistake.

It seems to me that there are sections in this article that are opinion based.

"The pipe paradigm has been criticized for performance, still the easy customization payoff is too valuable compared to the performance lost and doesn't present any issue in current Mbps throughput."

I think the terms easy and too valuable are matter of opinion.

"Adding new descriptors at the library is really fast and doesn't need any particular programming skill beside knowing how the packet is specified bit by bit."

Likewise, the term really fast hits the ear as an opinion. And assessing how much skill is needed does as well.

To be clear I don't disagree with these statements, just that they I think they don't match Wikipedia's tone and goal of neutrality. If there are objections, please raise them, otherwise I will submit an edit. Netherlands251 (talk) 12:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]