Talk:Ontario Highway 58/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Lede

• "The southern segment travels from Niagara Regional Road 3, formerly Highway 3, in Port Colborne, to the Highway 58A junction in the southern end of Welland, a distance of 7.2 km (4.5 mi); the northern segment begins at Highway 20 near Allanburg and travels north and west to a large junction with Highway 406 at the St. Catharines – Thorold boundary, a distance of 8.3 km (5.2 mi). " -too long. New sentence before the northern segment is fine.

• Fixed - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

• Isn't "travelled" a British English spelling?

• Not sure if Canadian English uses two or one, but I've always used two l's in my writing and never had it contested before. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Description

• "the route passes beneath a railway" -can you be more specific on the railway?

• Done. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Downloading

• "Budget constraints brought on by a recession in the 1990s resulted in the Mike Harris provincial government forming the Who Does What? committee to" -when was this?

• Specified the year. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Table

• Do you intend clearing those red links in the table?

• Done. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

My apologies, I don't believe I received a notice that the GAN had begun. I've made fixes as noted above. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: Making sure you've seen this. --Rschen7754 18:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, the ping didn't work! I did check in on this for a few weeks but left it when it seemed the writer wasn't coming back! Thanks for addressing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)