This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ontario Highway 19 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles
Hello, my name is Will and I will be reviewing this article.
Lead and box
"Highway 19 is 18.8 km (11.7 mi) long, which is similar to its original length in 1930, starting at Highway 3 in the south and ending at Highway 2 in the north." - This statement is kind of up out there. The length currently is explained but not its original length. It may be similar but doesn't explain how similar for people unfamiliar.--WillC02:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I didn't know Canada had county governments. Interesting.
The box looks good.
Route description
"where it encounter County Road 46 (Salford Road)." - Add an s to encounter.
History
"Baldwin Act and the Act to Authorize Formation of Joint Stock Companies" - Do none of these have articles of their own to be linked to?
"Plank and Gravel Road" - Is there a reason this is in italics? It is not in the lead. I may be missing something here.
A bit difficult to understand at times but I think that is because of all of the names and not the writing style.
Major intersections
Good
References
Assuming good faith on these.
External links
Looks good.
Criteria
Article looks good for its size and I've checked up on the author and he/she seems to know enough about the subject matter. However, I have one question: Is there anything else that can be added to this article? I don't know what, but for its size I feel there may be something left out. I'm gonna assume good faith that everything is done, but I still must ask. Otherwise, fix the above issues and I think it is good enough to pass.--WillC02:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Thank you for the review, and I'm very glad you like my box haha! :P
I've fixed the issues you've brought up. Unfortunately there is no article or likelihood of an article for the named act of legislature from 1849; there simply isn't enough info out there about it. I can understand your difficulty with the history: without a bit of familiarity with the layout of the area (or by studying the Google Maps link if you're out of the area), it can be almost impossible to visualize what is being explained.
That said, I believe the article covers every verifiable facet of the subject. There have been no controversies, significant pileups, or blackzones (stretches which often see deadly accidents). Cheers, Floydianτ¢21:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
