Talk:Ontario Highway 11A

Ontario Highway 11A has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 12, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Canada Roads: Ontario Mid‑importance

This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Ontario

This article has a KML file.

Refs

[1] - Floydian ^τ _¢ 23:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 11A/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 20:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

There is not much to do, though I see at least one dead source link. 7-day hold to Floydian. Ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes

Although the within old Toronto What's the missing word?
was built in the late 1920s, and closed in June 2005 Remove the comma here. User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences (CinS)
Hyphenate "much-needed"
The city instead opted to construct Oriole Parkway to Eglinton Avenue, and Avenue Road north of it. Remove comma (CinS)
The Hogg's Hollow bridge was incorporated in the new freeway, and continues to support the eastbound express lanes. Remove comma (CinS) and should "Bridge" be capitalized for consistency?
Metropolitan Toronto continued to sign the route from the Gardiner Expressway to Bombay Avenue, immediately north of the interchange with Highway 401 until the late 1990s. Complete the appositive by adding a comma after "401"

Sourcing and spot checks

Earwig does not find any issues.

I could not select randomly due to the heavy use of some offline sources. I have no issues with the sourcing I've identified, though I did catch a dead link.

4 (Filey 2019): Mentions the continued use of the original 1929 bridge for the eastbound express lanes of the 401.
12: Wanted to verify, but the source link is dead. Is this archived?
15: Used for the date of creation of Metro Toronto (April 15, 1953).

Other items

Three libre-licensed images (one CC and two PD-Canada-crown) with suitable captions. Add alt text.

All changes have been made. Ref#12 has been updated with an archive link, one of the all-too-often cases of government replacing something that wasn't broken with something that is broken. Thank you for the review! Didn't think I was going to gather up the will to do any work on here this week. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 17:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The archived [12] checks out. Will pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.