Talk:On Wings of Song (novel)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anonymous edit

This edit was by me - forgot to log in - sorry. ←Hob 18:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial failure

The previous author wrote that the book was "a commercial failure" -- which I'm pretty sure is the case, but it would be nice to have some details and evidence of that. ←Hob 18:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Clute quote

The quote that I've moved to the "Literary Significance & Criticism" section ends with "it lacks the complex, energetic denseness of the earlier book." What's the earlier book? I'm guessing Clute was probably referring to 334, but this should be clarified if someone can find the source. ←Hob 18:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]