Talk:Omnivoropteryx
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Omnivoropteryx article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge with Sapeornis?
[edit]The article doesn't give any reason not to? FunkMonk (talk) 03:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- I guess we could, though I'd like to be able to double-check the source that's listed as synonymizing them here. Omnivoropteryx has been pretty much ignored in the literature save for a few offhand mentions as far as I know, so while it probably is a junior synonym, I don't know if there's really enough justification for it at this time (similar to Cryptovolans/Microraptor). However, Greg Paul also synonymized them without comment in his new field guide, so if the Anatomy paper does indeed suggest they are synonyms I don't see a reason not to do it (especially if the later actually gives some kind of rationale). MMartyniuk (talk) 04:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class dinosaurs articles
- Low-importance dinosaurs articles
- WikiProject Dinosaurs articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- Wikipedia requested images of birds
- WikiProject Birds articles