Talk:Omar Navarro

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Convicted Felon Mention

A single-purpose account removed the mention of Navarro as a convicted felon. It is my opinion that this affects the accuracy of the article but I do not feel comfortable putting it back without first reaching a consensus here. --DrSangChi (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe adding convicted felon is off-putting. He has been convicted for stalking his ex wife. It doesn't seem like something that is serious. He is a politician. Bruv moment 8 (talk) 09:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

Does not summarize the body. It should mention his routine felonies, not just the newest. After all, they make up half the article. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

I saw the complaint at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Omar Navarro article by Ivanvector and I think it is partially justified. It is okay for the article to be mostly about Mr. Navarro's crimes (though it would be useful if someone could add other details of his life), since that is highly noteworthy about him as a candidate. The article didn't need to make the sidebar a list of crimes, though, or include his mugshot, so I removed those. --editeur24 (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 October 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– This should be moved over the dab. Omar Navarro (politician) is the PT. The other entry in the dab is not even at a conflicting title. Hatnotes can be used for further clarification. MB 16:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Relisting. DrKay (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:PTOPIC and WP:PTM. Probably could have been done WP:BOLDly. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanvector, have you seen this since your !vote. The RM was modified to keep the dab, which also got expanded with a PTM and a rater obscure entry. MB 16:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me (speaking as the editor who had recently created that disambiguation page in lieu of the previous redirect to Gran Omar, who apparently isn't widely referred to by that version of his real name anyway). Regards, HaeB (talk) 06:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. per wp:primarytopic Slithytoad (talk) 12:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC) !vote by sock of community-banned User:Kauffner struck. Favonian (talk) 09:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support views show the politician gets 4,288 while Gran Omar gets 850 and Omar Navarro Rutinelly gets 27[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.