Talk:Olof Jonsson

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Complete Failure" is not an option

Glad to see the source for narrative, But "The experiment was a complete failure." A rather general sweeping statement. How was it a complete failure? that it wasn't 100% accurate? Was the test over 50% success. I'm researching this and may clear this up with more data and a rewrite. Get your red pencils ready. Ourhistory153 (talk) 20:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NASA and scientists disagreed it was a failure.

~ Astronaut Edgar Mitchell with team members Dr.Karlis Osis and Dr. Rhine communicated in a preliminary analysis that the results would prove quite interesting.[The Way of the Explorer Dr. Edgar Mitchell ISBN-13 978-1-56414-977-0 pg 76 Ourhistory153 (talk) 22:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]